The Anti-Weaponization Fund is a $1.7 billion fund created by the Justice Department as part of a settlement agreement in President Trump's lawsuit against the IRS. The fund is designed to provide reparations to individuals who claim they were victims of politically motivated acts by the Justice Department under past administrations.
深度探索
先修知识
- 暂无数据。
后续步骤
- 暂无数据。
深度探索
Questions over ‘anti-weaponization fund’本站收录:
Tonight, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have questions over a new billion-dollar fund by the Justice Department. It was created as part of a settlement agreement in President Trump's lawsuit against the IRS he filed with his sons.
Well, tonight lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have questions over a new billion-dollar fund by the Justice Department. It was created as part of a settlement agreement in President Trump's lawsuit against the IRS that he filed with his sons. The Anti-Weaponization Fund is available for those who claim they were victims of politically motivated acts by the Justice Department under past administrations. Reporter Alexandria Huff has the story. Plenty of strong reaction on Capitol Hill and beyond following the announcement of a $1.7 billion anti-weaponization fund, which will pay reparations to President Trump's allies for what they call judicial abuse by the Biden administration. More than a few Republicans are asking tough questions about using taxpayer money to compensate those who have been convicted of crimes.
>> What I want to know is uh the how the fund is created and what its purpose is and uh the legality of creating a fund that uh Congress hasn't had anything to say about.
>> Democrats going even further, calling it a slush fund with no oversight.
>> We've gotten to the point where Donald Trump is just stealing in broad daylight from the American people.
>> And some experts are warning paying reparations for something that happened so recently could set a dangerous precedent.
>> It's our previous president. It's it's it's his predecessor in the office. And and so that's what makes this, I think, particularly unusual and raising eyebrows. But the administration is defending the move, claiming the president and his family will not receive funds. Anybody can apply. The commission will set The commissioners will will set rules, I'm sure.
>> And it's unlikely the president will lose much political ground with his base. I think it will be seen as kind of another instance of him sort of putting what's important to him personally, the transactional element of a lot of what he does, you know, these people got hurt, I think, I'm going to give them money.
Democrats say they will challenge the fund in court. We'll be right back.
相关推荐
MISTRIAL?! Judge Faces Jury Misconduct Bombshell Va. v Dr Ebony Parker
TAKEIT2TRIAL
110 views•2026-05-20
Former Spokane health officer Dr. Bob Lutz settles lawsuit against health district for $1.65 million
KREM2NewsSpokane
139 views•2026-05-16
Why The US Constitution Is Nearly IMPOSSIBLE to Amend
ConstitutionalSoundBites
393 views•2026-05-17
Suspect in UW student stabbing surrenders
KING5Seattle
244 views•2026-05-15
PRESS CONFERENCE: Buzbee Law Firm Press Conference on Ramón Ayala Lawsuit
KRIS6News
719 views•2026-05-15
NEVER Wait for the Insurance Company After a Crash (Do This First)
CEOLawyer
130 views•2026-05-19
Spirit Airlines faces lawsuit from former employees
ABCNews
53K views•2026-05-15
Joseph Duggar Wants UNSUPERVISED Access to His Kids Amid Abuse Charges
HiddenTrueCrime
140 views•2026-05-20











