This report provides a clear-eyed look at the institutional friction between executive ambition and legislative restraint in the face of escalating geopolitical risks. It effectively highlights how domestic political checks ultimately define the boundaries of international brinkmanship.
深度探索
先修知识
- 暂无数据。
后续步骤
- 暂无数据。
深度探索
Senate setback for Trump on Iran; Supreme Leader’s warning on enriched uranium | Janta Ka Reporter本站收录:
US President Donald Trump has finally seen his majority dwindle in the Senate over the conflict with Iran, as a resolution seeking to curb his powers advanced by a 50–47 vote. Elsewhere, Reuters reports that Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei has stated that the highly enriched uranium stockpile will never leave Iran. Rifat Jawaid explains what these developments mean for Trump during ongoing negotiations. ~ Please support independent journalism here 👇🏻 BuyMeCoffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/JantaKaReporter Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/rifatjawaid PayPal: paypal.me/rifatjawaid
US President Donald Trump has finally faced a setback in the Senate as a resolution calling to curb his powers over the Iran war managed to advance with a majority for the first time. This is a massive setback for the deranged occupant of the White House and I shall explain how in a bit. Meanwhile, the Iranian Supreme Leader has made it abundantly clear that Iran will never hand over its highly enriched uranium to anyone. This announcement came amidst reports that the US negotiators were prepared to make concessions to achieve a peace deal with Iran. Thomas Massie's defeat in the Republican primary has brought the role of the Jewish stroke Israeli lobby under scrutiny in the US.
Elsewhere, Israeli terrorists have continued to showcase their barbarity by bombing another hospital in Lebanon.
This will be the broad focus of my video tonight, so please stay tuned. So, the Israeli clown from the White House has had to face his first Senate setback as a resolution calling to curb his powers over the Iran war advanced in the Senate this week. This was passed by 50 to 47 with several Republican lawmakers switching sides. And these were the Republican senators who had previously voted against this resolution >> last night while this was going on.
Guess what Senate voted for? We can say pro-war all we want. Trump didn't win the Senate last night because there was a Senate uh war resolution last night.
Let me see what page this is on. If you tell me, Rob, what page that is on.
>> Seven times they voted no last night.
Number eight they vote yes. This is massive.
>> Put the president in handcuffs. This is massive because yesterday the people who got voted to become senators voted to not allow the president to do what he wants to do with the war. So this I don't I don't think America is a pro-war. I don't think that's the argument that was made. So yesterday US Senate Senate advances Iran war power resolution historic first. The Senate voted 50 to 47 on Tuesday to advance war power resolution requiring Trump to end military operation in Iran and obtain congressional authorization. This was the eighth attempt since the war began February 28th and the first to succeed and a decisive flip. Bill Cassidy, Republican Louisiana, who recently lost, who had voted no on all prior time, switched after the Louisiana primary lost, removed political uh leverage over him. The war has now run 81 days, 21 days past the 60-day war powers act of legal deadlines.
>> What this means is that Congress is now moving to formally debate and vote on legally forcing the Israeli lab to halt military actions against Iran unless he receives explicit congressional approval. No wonder his tone has changed and so has his administrations during the negotiations with Iran. There are reports that the US is prepared to make concessions to achieve the much anticipated peace deal with Iran. That's because even Trump now knows that he can't afford hostility with the Islamic Republic unless he's willing to accept more public humiliation. A reporter asked him about this today. Another reporter also drew his attention to the news of Iran and Oman drawing up a joint mechanism to manage the state of Hormus.
Watch how he responded to both the questions.
>> My second question is the vice president mentioned the other day there would be accommodations. They were willing to make accommodations with the Iranian deal. Um could you kind of expand on those possible accommodations as does that include >> When you say combination of what >> accommodations? He's talking about accommodations as far as making a deal uh making a deal going. Is that would that include the proxies?
>> Right now we're negotiating >> and we'll see. But either we're going to get it one way or the other. They're not going to have a nuclear weapon. You know, when people hear it because often times they won't put up the second part of the sentence having to do with I'll say this is more important than anything that we have to talk about and usually they'll cut it off the fake news. I said because this is the nuclearization of a country that some people would say is somewhat crazy and we cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. That's all it is.
We can't let it. You will have uh a nuclear war in the Middle East and that war will come here. That war will go to Europe. Uh we cannot let that happen and it won't happen. It's not going to happen. That's more important than anything else. We can't I can think of nothing that's more important than the fact that we cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon and and we won't. Yeah.
Jeeoff, >> uh following up on that, sir, Iran is negotiating with Oman to set up a formalization of charging tolls in the straight of Hormuz. Is that acceptable to you?
>> Well, we're looking at it. We hear about it. They've negotiated. They've had a relationship with them before. Uh and we'll see. Uh, we have total control of the straight of Armus, as you know, with our blockade. The blockade's been 100% effective. Nobody's been able to get through. It's like a steel wall. It's our navy. We have the greatest military anywhere in the world. We wiped out their navy. We not wiped out their air.
I think they're down to about Sorry, I have to cut him here. Why must we suffer Trump's cognitive decline?
Trump secretary of thug Marco Rubio too was asked about the ongoing talks. He said Trump was keen to get a good deal even though he didn't elaborate what was the definition of that good deal.
>> Iranian state media suggesting that the US proposals closed some of the gaps or is potentially closing gaps.
>> Well, I don't want to get ahead of it to make here here's I think we've made some progress but obviously we're dealing with a system that itself is a little fractured. Um uh so the Iranian system and so but that said there'll be a couple visits. I understand uh I believe uh the Pakistanis will be traveling to Thran today. So hopefully that'll advance this further. The president's preference is to do a good deal. That's his preference. It's always been his preference. If we can get a good deal done that would be great. I'm not here to tell you that it's going to happen for sure. But I'm here to tell you that we're going to do everything we can to see if we can get one. But if we can't get a good deal, the president's been clear. He has other options. I'm not going to elaborate on what those are, but everybody knows what those are. But his preference is always a deal. His preference is always an agreement. His preference is always diplomacy. So, um, let's see if we can get there. Um, there's some good signs, but we understand this. I don't want to be overly optimistic as well. So, let's see what happens over the next few days. The problem for Trump is not just the growing disenchantment against his war of choice in the US. The depraved Israeli slave appears to have made peace with the fact that there is absolutely no way he's going to outsmart Iran in diplomatic negotiations.
Watch how Trump's favorite TV channel Fox News reported the latest announcement by Iranian Supreme Leader Sayy Mashtab on the 450 kg stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Good morning to you and some breaking news out of the White House this morning. They are pushing back hard on this Reuters report this morning that claims that the Iranian Supreme Leader allegedly said that the enriched uranium that is inside the country right now will not be allowed to leave as part of any peace agreement or nuclear deal. That would have complicated these talks by a lot.
that it would have really ticked off Israel.
>> But Trump has to cater to his constituency of blind followers, whatever small number of them are left now. So he continues to delude himself by claiming that he will get that stockpile out of Iran.
>> Can they keep their highlyenriched uranium?
>> No. No. We get the highlyenriched. We will get it. We don't need it. We don't want it. We'll probably destroy it after we get it, but we're not going to let them have it.
The root cause of the current global crisis is Trump's eagerness to wage an illegal war against a sovereign country to please his terrorist Israeli masters.
As I said before, the rogue regime of the illegal settler colony is the single biggest reason for the unrest across the world. Not just in the region, across the world. Because the fact that the entire world is suffering now is because of that one tiny illegal settler colony.
Human devils who should have been languishing in jail are controlling America through their sellout politicians. The world now knows the true colors of the Israeli terrorist and their unspeakable brutalities in Gaza during the recent Holocaust. People who historically supported this genocidal entity are now finally inclined to speak some truth. Watch Maryland Governor Wes More.
>> Did Israel commit a genocide in Gaza?
>> You know, I I think that it's going to have to be international tribunals to figure that out. Um, but I do think this is so I know what I know and I know as a military person that you cannot use food as a negotiating tool. That is a war crime and I think BB Netanyahu has committed war crimes. I think that you know >> should he be in prison do you think?
>> Well I mean look at it this way. Uh and first of all he's actually under investigation indictment already right now.
>> I see.
>> But that's exactly right. But also if you look at what's happened in Lebanon even just since the start of the Iran war he's annexed and taken over you know 10% of Lebanon. That again is a war crime. And so I just don't know how we can continue tolerating these type of actions by BB Netanyahu. Uh, and not only because they are they are illegal, but also because he's not making Jewish people safe. He's not making Israelis safe. He's not making Jewish people in this country safe. We're dealing with such a such a rise in anti-semitism, anti- anti-Islamophobia, uh, anti-lack. We're dealing with such a rise of hate. And I and I see it every week because as a chief executive, I get intel reports from the FBI. I get intel reports from our intelligence agencies, you know, and so I see what is happening where just a couple days ago we were dealing with a situation of an anti-semitic attack in in only at an elementary school elementary school like this is real and we have to be able to deal with this rising level of hate. But the challenge that I have is I don't know if BB Netanyahu actually believes that there should be Palestinian safety or Palestinian peace. Do you consider yourself Zionist?
>> I think that the state of Israel has a right to exist, but I also think that so do Palestinian people.
>> No wonder top MAGA supporters have also been unequivocal in highlighting the war crimes of these Israeli barbarians.
Yesterday, I showed you what Tucker Carlson, Nick Fintes, and Candace Owens had to say. You can watch that video here. Now watch another MAGA named Megan Kelly exposing a Zionist American here.
>> Head of the Republican party. That's not enough for Trump. He's he's the boss.
And Massie bucked him on everything that was important to him. Uh in terms ter terms of Israel, Megan, it's important to remember not one nickel of that money came from Israel. It came from American Americans who are Jew many of them were Jewish. Apac who who support Israel. But this wasn't this wasn't just about this wasn't just about this about Israel. It wasn't just about this war.
>> Those donations were largely about Israel.
>> Thomas Massie would was the only vote 420 to1 on a non-binding resolution condemning attacks anti-semitic attacks on people when two people young beautiful young couple was killed in Washington DC. There were other attacks around the country on on Jews, not Israelis, American Jews. Um, and Massie wouldn't he's the only one. Ilenomore voted. I mean, didn't vote with Tom Massie. AOC didn't vote with Tom Massie.
None of the other libertarians voted. He this thing where he's this ant this Tel Aviv crack.
>> What does Apac stand for again, Carl?
>> Well, I'm talking about anti-semitism.
And I have to tell you, you you think >> I get it, but to to pretend this is all about that vote and I condemned that shooting. It was horrific and I condemn all anti-semitism. I fought against it against very openly on this show for years. But what does Apac stand for?
>> Um, American Israeli something committee.
>> Political action committ.
>> Yeah. It's not American interest. It's not American Jewish people. It's about America and Israel. That's what they're pushing for and you're saying American take my words for it. What are you What are you saying here?
>> No, of course I support American Jews and I've defended American Jews and I put my record of defending American Jews up against yours any day, Carl. Any day of the week. I will always protect American Jews. However, Apac has admitted it. Here is their tweet. Ed Galerin's victory in Kentucky and Klay Fuller's win in Georgia ensures two outspoken pro-Israel voices are positioned to fill seats previously held by outspoken detractors Thomas Massie and MTG. Our community was proud to help pro-Israel candidates win these races.
That's from Apac. I I rest my case.
>> Oh, fine. But what I'm saying is that Massie was different than all these other people uh who questioned the war.
He this guy wouldn't I said on our show he wouldn't even vote for a a resolution you know congressional medal for Jack Nicholas he's just a very contrary person who I thought until recently was a principal person but this this that that crack in Tel Aviv to me that's anti-semitism voting against an anti- voting against a resolution that every >> how is that anti-semitism on him being obsessed with Israel which I mean you can make the case that GR's not but that's what the knock.
>> But I'm not but I'm not talking about Israel right now. I'm talking about an anti-semitic resolution. He's the only person in the house who voted against.
>> You're flipflopping. Now, let's go back to his you saying the knock the comment about Tel Aviv is anti-semitism. How?
>> Oh, he's just he's you know that's what that's what he's saying. This guy's a tool of Israel. He's not you know he's a Navy Seal by the way. Oh, and Megan expl your argument's falling apart. I'm bringing somebody else in cuz I got to keep going. said, >> "Not only has this illegal aparthide entity been responsible for disturbing global peace through a sustained campaign of mass murder and genocide, this illegal settler colony has also activated its billionaire assets in the US to hijack the American democracy."
Testament to this was how Thomas Masi was made to lose his Republican primary this week just because he was against the funding of Israel the Iran war and had also demanded full transparency on the release of the Epstein files. Watch what Democratic Congressman Roana had to say on Massiey's defeat.
>> You think they ousted Mr. Massie because he was leading on the Epstein files?
They asked him because he was leading on the Epstein files and because he was leading the push against the war in Iran and because he was leading the push saying we can't give another dollar uh to Israel while it's violating human rights. I >> think you need another Republican partner to push forward. This goes to next Congress.
>> Well, Thomas is still here for seven months. I wouldn't underestimate him. Uh look, we're going to do a lot of things in these next seven months to hold the Epstein class accountable to stop these foreign wars. But there were voters under 45 who voted for Thomas at over 30%. Let me tell you something. These young voters, they're done with the old guard. They're done with lectures about how AI is going to be good. They're done with people who want to just give money to foreign wars. And we welcome them in a new populist Democratic party. A Democratic party that's going to say, "We're done with the establishment.
We're a party that's against the Epstein class. We're a party that's for taxing billionaires. We're a party that is against foreign wars. We're a party that doesn't want more aid going to Israel, that wants jobs programs here. This is going to be the movement that helps build a majority in this country. And people have had it with the establishment of both parties.
>> Thank you.
>> But the most shocking statement came from Jewish American journalist John Pad Horitz who publicly claimed that the Jewish money was responsible for masses defeat. He said this to flaunt his Jewish supremacy.
But if we said the same, because many feel that that's a fact, we would be accused of pushing anti-semitic tropes. Pay attention to every single word of this Zionist. I think it is a good thing if Massie and the people like him and others believe that if you cross if you cross the line into anti-semitism, Jews are going to use the power that we have openly to go for you because what other recourse is there? Are we just going to sit here and take it? Beg for scraps, hope that nice people in, you know, uh, are are are nice to us? The Democratic party is going explicitly anti-semitic.
We can see it happening. People are getting benefits, as Seth says, for being anti-semites. That seems to be part of an appeal in primaries to the left and the party.
We have to use what means there are at our disposal. And in my view, and I'm going to put it blank, that is Jewish money. There is an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics, by which I mean Jewish donors, wildly disproportionate, not only charitably, but politically. And when I say charitably, I mean nobody really knows the numbers. Jews make up 2% of the population. And according to some studies, Jews make up 20% of the charitable contributions made in the United States annually. That is a tenfold.
Think about that. Think about the disproportion of that. And in politics, it's pretty close also. And if that money isn't used, what why do people give money? Because they want to influence elections to get people elected who reflect their views. Well, this is an existential issue for Jews.
and the Jews who explicitly give money because they want to make it clear to anti-Semitic candidates that they are going to have to go through a buzzsaw and that they are not going to simply waltz in and be, you know, be if they're treated with kid gloves by the New York Times, we are double time going to do what we can to expose who they are, to find out what we can find out about them that will harm them, and that we will do what we can to prevent them from taking office. What other choice does American jewelry have?
>> Meanwhile, Israeli terrorists have continued to showcase their depravity in Gaza and Lebanon.
This was the scene of a hospital in Lebanon immediately after Israeli bombing. This is happening because this rogue entity and its war criminals know that they enjoy the full support of the western politicians and their so-called media outlets. Most politicians and journalists in the west have now lost their humanity. Their humanity is dead and buried. They're quite happy to be recognized as morally bankrupt human devils who enjoy the sight of genocide, who enjoy the sight of babies being slaughtered and holocaust on their mobile devices. I will leave you with the broadcast of the BBC, my former employer, unfortunately this morning.
Remember what Israeli terrorist Beng did to hundreds of activists by torturing them and then humiliating them in public?
But how did the rogue BBC report this news? According to the BBC, Bengavir was only taunting these activists. I'm not making this up.
This is the true color of the rogue BBC.
This is the BBC's way of whitewashing Israeli crimes against humanity. This is one clip from this morning's BBC Radio 5 live broadcast.
There's been international condemnation of Israel's treatment of Gaza aid Flutella activists. A video released by Israel's farright national security minister Beng shows him taunting the activists after they were detained. The foreign secretary of vet Cooper said the video had shown disgraceful scenes and she demanded an urgent explanation from the Israeli embassy. That's it from me.
Thank you very much for your support of this platform and our journalism. If you haven't subscribed to my channel, please do so because that's one of the many ways you can support independent journalism.
相关推荐
Head of US Central Command faces questions over Iran war at committee
SkyNews
4K views•2026-05-19
Trump Reaffirms Alliance With Japan After China Visit
ntdtv
254 views•2026-05-16
Trump says delaying Iran attack at request of Gulf leaders
dawndotcom
732 views•2026-05-19
Is the era of Western naval dominance finally coming to a close?
NeutralityStudiesShorts
591 views•2026-05-17
USA AND ISRAEL VS IRAN WAR EXPLAINED | INDIA ATTACKED?
lovewithcountryball777
104 views•2026-05-16
BRICS Fully ABANDONS Iran After Alliance Collapses
globalanalysis-y9o
492 views•2026-05-19
Saudi Crown Prince Limits U.S. Role Amid Iran Crisis
Global_Lens.official
136 views•2026-05-20
All In with Chris Hayes 5/19/26 | 🅼🆂🅽🅱️🅲 Breaking News Today May 19, 2026
FreeSPPA
19K views•2026-05-20











