The speaker argues that military bombing campaigns require careful strategic assessment of objectives and outcomes. The speaker references a 38-day bombing campaign that failed to achieve its intended political objectives, suggesting that military force alone may not accomplish desired political changes. This illustrates the principle that military strategy must consider political goals and that prolonged military operations without achieving strategic objectives may be counterproductive.
深掘り
前提条件
- データがありません。
次のステップ
- データがありません。
深掘り
Iran Nuclear Threat & "Fake News" Showdown! #IranNuclearDeal #FakeNews #MilitaryVictoryインデックス作成:
A powerful declaration on Iran's nuclear future and a fiery confrontation with the media! "Iran will never have a nuclear weapon." Plus, a direct call-out to "fake news" outlets.
On Iran, Mr. President, just to be clear. I mean, what what's next? Are you Is is the threat of the bombing starting again? How realistic is that? I don't want to say that. I mean, I'd like to tell you.
I'd like to say on a certain hour, certain day, the bombing is going to start. I don't want to say that.
I can only say that Iran I can say this with very, very strong conviction, Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. Not going to happen.
No chance. What would the use be of repeating the bombing? You You did it for 38 days.
And you did not get the political changes in Iran.
>> I got I I had a total military victory.
And the fake news, guys like you write that incorrectly. You're a fake guy.
Guys like you write about incorrectly.
We had a total military victory. We knocked out their entire navy. We knocked out their entire air force. We knocked out all of their anti-aircraft weaponry.
We knocked out all of their radar. We knocked out all of their leaders, number one. And then we knocked out all of their leaders in the second division.
And we knocked out numerous of their leaders in the third division. And they're very confused.
We've had a total victory except by people like you that don't write the truth, you know? You should write I actually think it's sort of treasonous what you write. But you and the New York Times and CNN I would say are the worst.
On another On another war, should we not have On another war, should we not have Your Your editors tell you what to write. And you write it. You should be ashamed of it.
But we have bridges we could knock out.
We could knock out their bridges and their electrical capacity within two days we could knock out the whole thing.
And then I read the New York Times and they they act like they're doing well.
Everybody knows it. That's why your subscribers are way down. You know, the Times subscribers are way down because it's fake news.
関連おすすめ
Head of US Central Command faces questions over Iran war at committee
SkyNews
4K views•2026-05-19
Trump Reaffirms Alliance With Japan After China Visit
ntdtv
254 views•2026-05-16
Trump says delaying Iran attack at request of Gulf leaders
dawndotcom
732 views•2026-05-19
Is the era of Western naval dominance finally coming to a close?
NeutralityStudiesShorts
591 views•2026-05-17
USA AND ISRAEL VS IRAN WAR EXPLAINED | INDIA ATTACKED?
lovewithcountryball777
104 views•2026-05-16
BRICS Fully ABANDONS Iran After Alliance Collapses
globalanalysis-y9o
492 views•2026-05-19
Saudi Crown Prince Limits U.S. Role Amid Iran Crisis
Global_Lens.official
136 views•2026-05-20
All In with Chris Hayes 5/19/26 | 🅼🆂🅽🅱️🅲 Breaking News Today May 19, 2026
FreeSPPA
19K views•2026-05-20











